Fusion Power Associates
2 Professional Drive, Suite 249
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
phone: (301) 258-0545
fax: (301) 975-9869
e-mail: FusionPwrAssoc@aol.com
web: http://fusionpower.org


FPN ARCHIVES: | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024

|| FPA Home | FPN's | budget history ||

FPN12-47

Holdren Comments on New York Times Fusion Posting

October 19, 2012

Non-fiction science and environmental writer Andrew Revkin posted a lengthy article on the October 18 New York Times online Opinion Page titled "With Tight Research Budgets, Is There Room for the Eternal Promise of Fusion?" The article includes a lengthy assessment of the current status of both inertial and magnetic fusion programs by Stanford physicist Burton Richter. The full article can be accessed at:

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/with-tight-research-budgets-is-there-room-for-the-eternal-promise-of-fusion/ The article is followed by numerous comments submitted by readers. One of them is from President Obama's science advisor, John Holdren. Holdren states:

"I think it's about as clear and balanced an account as could be fit into this amount of space. If I were to add a little bit, I'd note that both magnetic and inertial-confinement fusion studies can stand comparison with most other domains of "big physics" fundamental research, in terms of the pace at which they have generated new knowledge in physics as well as spin-off technologies useful in other domains of science and practice. If somebody wanted a lot more, I'd refer them to the opening chapters of the PCAST review of the US fusion research program that I chaired for President Clinton in 1995, which is at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-95-fusion.pdf (The later chapters are somewhat dated, of course, but the opening ones outline the rationale for pursuing fusion research and the metrics for evaluating it in a way I'm still happy with.)"

JOHN P. HOLDREN, PhD Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Executive Office of the President of the United States