High Performance PbLi Blanket
M. S. Tillacka and S. Malangb
aFusion Energy Research Program, University of
California, San Diego
San Diego, CA
92093-0417
bForschungszentrum GmbH, Postfach 3640
D-76021
Karlsruhe, Germany
Abstract -- A novel blanket concept is described. The proposed design is a
dual coolant concept based on ferritic steel as structural material using
helium to cool the first wall. The temperature of the entire steel structure
is maintained below the 550°C limit. The breeding zone is cooled by
circulating the liquid metal breeder to external heat exchangers. Flow channel
inserts are employed in the poloidal liquid breeder ducts, serving both as
electrical and thermal insulator between the flowing liquid metal and the steel
structure. In this way, a liquid metal exit temperature of about 700°C is
achievable, allowing either an advanced Rankine steam cycle or a closed-cycle
helium gas turbine (Brayton cycle) as power conversion system. A gross thermal
efficiency of about 45% can be achieved with either system.
I. INTRODUCTION
Economically attractive magnetic fusion power reactors require high power
density and high thermal conversion efficiency to offset the high capital cost.
Previous power plant studies (e.g., [1]) have established a minimum goal
for the average neutron wall load of >= 3 MW/m2 and a minimum
thermal efficiency of the blanket system of >= 40%. It can be shown that
this combination of high power density with sufficiently high efficiency in the
power conversion system can not be achieved with solid breeder blankets
irrespective of the structural material used, because the maximum breeder
temperature of all candidate breeder materials would exceed specified
limits.
Self-cooled lithium blankets with vanadium alloy as structural material allow
for both high power density and high temperatures leading to high efficiency.
However, they are generally ruled out for safety reasons if water is used in
other components of the machine. For example, this causes a dilemma for a Low
Aspect Ratio (LAR) tokamak employing a water-cooled centerpost. Safety
concerns could be overcome by using the eutectic lead lithium alloy Pb-17Li
instead of lithium. However, the heat transport properties as well as the
compatibility with ferritic steels and vanadium alloys for this liquid metal
are not as good as with lithium.
Giancarli et al. [2], proposed a self-cooled PbLi blanket based on a SiC/SiC
composite as structural material. The electrical resistance of this composite
material, which is basically a semiconductor, is expected to be high enough to
keep the MHD pressure drop within tolerable limits.
The major issues not yet resolved for such a blanket concept include:
- The large surface heat flux at the first wall requires a relatively high
thermal conductivity of the SiC/SiC composite in order to avoid excessively
large temperature differences across the wall, leading to intolerably high
thermal stresses.
- The rather large stresses in the containing walls caused by the static
pressure and by the disruption forces acting on the liquid metal have to be
reacted by the composite material, which has very low ductility.
- The use of the SiC/SiC composite as the structural material for a large
pressure vessel with a complicated form requires the development of new
fabrication methods, especially novel joining techniques which are compatible
with the liquid metal filling.
- High temperatures of the lead-lithium coolant are required to achieve a
sufficiently high thermal efficiency in the power conversion system. The
compatibility of SiC with flowing Pb-17Li at temperatures up to 800°C
still has to be proven.
Most of these problems are avoided with the blanket concept described in this
paper. The proposed design is a dual coolant concept similar to the one
described in [3], based on ferritic steel as structural material using helium
to cool the first wall. The temperature of the entire steel structure is
maintained below the 550°C limit. The breeding zone is cooled by
circulating the liquid metal breeder to external heat exchangers. Flow channel
inserts are employed in the poloidal liquid breeder ducts, serving both as
electrical and thermal insulator between the flowing liquid metal and the steel
structure. In this way, a liquid metal exit temperature of about 700°C is
achievable, allowing either an advanced Rankine steam cycle or a closed-cycle
helium gas turbine (Brayton cycle) as power conversion system. A gross thermal
efficiency of about 45% can be achieved with both systems.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE BLANKET SEGMENT
A cross section of the blanket segment is shown schematically in Fig. I. The
concept is characterized by a U-shaped first wall (FW) with helium cooling
channels oriented in the radial/toroidal direction. This FW forms, together
with the helium manifolds at the back side of the segment, a box containing the
liquid metal breeder. A grid of steel plates inside this box creates large
liquid metal ducts and, as an additional function, reinforces the FW box.
Inside all liquid metal ducts, which are oriented in the poloidal direction,
there are flow channel inserts made of silicon carbide. These inserts serve as
electrical as well as thermal insulators between the flowing liquid metal and
the steel structure. In addition to the first wall, the grid plates also are
cooled by helium in order to keep the steel structure below 550°C. The
Pb-17Li enters the blanket at the bottom, flows upwards in the front row of
parallel ducts, turns around at the top by 180° and flows down in the two
parallel rows at the rear side of the blanket. The FW box is fabricated by
diffusion welding and subsequent bending of the straight plates containing the
milled coolant channels. A cross section of the FW is shown in Fig. II. The
grid plates with smaller coolant channels are similar and also fabricated by
diffusion welding.

Fig. I. Outboard blanket cross-section

Fig. II. Cross section of the first wall
box
The incoming helium at 350°C first cools the FW and then the grid plates,
where it is heated up to 500°C. The helium flow is subdivided into two
completely independent systems. The cooling channels in the FW as well as
those in the grid plates are alternatively connected to one of the two systems
in order to minimize the FW temperature increase in case of a Loss of Coolant
Accident (LOCA) in one of the systems. Another benefit of the alternating flow
directions is the more equal temperature distribution in the entire segment,
resulting in lower thermal stresses.
The selected design of the helium cooling system is characterized by the
following features:
- Integrated manifolds. The helium manifolds are an integral part of
the segment box. Separate welds are not required between each cooling channel
and the manifolds, which is expected to increase reliability.
- Multiple passes of the coolant through the FW. The total helium mass
flow passes four times through the FW before it is used to cool the grid
plates. This means, for example, that for a total temperature rise between
helium inlet and outlet from 350°C to 500°C the highest helium bulk
temperature in the FW is about 420°C and the temperature increase in one
pass is less than 20°C. Another important result of this flow scheme is
the possibility to use large coolant channels in combination with a high flow
velocity, resulting in low bending stresses in the FW box caused by the liquid
metal pressure.
- Adjustment of the number of parallel channels per pass to the local power
density and the helium bulk temperature. This increases the helium
velocity and, consequently, the heat transfer coefficients in regions of
potentially high structural temperatures, minimizing the maximum FW
temperature.
- Alternating flow direction in the FW coolant channels. The helium of
the two cooling loops flows in opposite directions through the FW cooling
channels. This leads to a symmetric temperature field in the segment box with
lower thermal stresses.
- Heat transfer at the FW enhanced by surface roughening. Artificial
surface roughening at the FW enhances the heat transfer at the wall with the
high heat flux. Since only one of four walls in a channel is roughened, the
increase in pressure drop is marginal. This method results in lower structural
temperatures and smaller temperature variations in the segment box.
- Cooling the FW and stiffening grid plates in series. The power
density is highest in the FW and decreases in the radial direction. Flowing in
series means lower temperature in the FW and higher coolant temperatures in
regions with lower power density, minimizing temperature differences in the
segment structure. The flow in the grid plate manifolds is similar to that of
the first wall.
III. BLANKET THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LAYOUT
A. Design Parameters
Parameters have been assumed for a preliminary layout of the blanket system.
These parameters are summarized in Table I. First wall dimensions, grid plate
dimensions, cooling channel size and spacing of the grid plates were estimated
based on maintaining acceptable mechanical stresses in the structure in case
the segment is pressurized to the full He pressure (plus static pressure of
Pb-17Li) in the event of of a LOCA. The geometric design parameters are
indicated in Figs.II and III.
Table I
Parameters Assumed for Thermal-Hydraulic
Analysis
| Average neutron wall load
|
| 4 MW/m2
|
| Average first wall heat flux
|
| 0.8 MW/m2
|
| Total
energy multiplication in the blanket
|
| 1.4
|
| Radial
depth of the breeding zone
|
| 0.75 m
|
| Toroidal
width of a segment
|
| 1 m
|
| Height of the blankets
|
| 20 m
|
| Helium pressure
|
| 8 MPa
|
| Helium
inlet/FW outlet/blanket outlet temperature
|
| 350 / 420 / 500°C
|
| Pb-17Li
in/outlet temperature
|
| 480°C / 700°C
|

Fig. III. Configuration of a breeding zone
cell.
B. Segment Power Distribution and Flow Rates
One segment of the blanket is assumed to be 1 m wide by 20 m high
(representative of a highly-elongated plasma as found in LAR tokamaks).
Therefore, with 4 MW/m2 average neutron wall loading, the total
volumetric heat generation is 112 MW. In the absence of detailed neutronics
analysis, we assume the power deposition is roughly proportional to the volume
fractions, so that 100 MW is deposited in the PbLi and 12 MW in steel. With
0.8 MW/m2 average surface heat flux, an additional 16 MW is
deposited in the FW. For the estimation of the heat fluxes through the 10 mm
thick insulator plates the material properties listed in Table II are used.
The power distribution results shown in Table III require the coolant flow
rates listed in Table IV.
Table II
Thermal Properties Used in the Analysis
| Steel conductivity
|
| 25 W/m-K
|
| web thickness
|
| 4 mm
|
| Pb-17Li conductivity
|
| 15 W/m-K
|
| thickness
|
| 3.5 mm
|
| SiC conductivity
|
| 4 W/m-K
|
| thickness
|
| 10 mm
|
| He
heat transfer coefficient
|
| 2000
W/m2-K
|
| Pb-17Li
heat trans. coefficient
|
| 1000
W/m2-K
|
| He heat capacity
|
| 5200 J/kg-K
|
| PbLi heat capacity
|
| 190 J/kg-K
|
Table
III
Power Distribution in Blanket Segment (MW)
| Volumetric Heating
|
| 112
|
|
in Pb-17Li
|
| 100
|
| in SS
|
| 12
|
| Surface Heating
|
| 16
|
| Heat Removed in He
|
|
|
| Surface heat
|
| 16
|
| Volumetric heat in SS
|
| 12
|
| Heat transferred from PbLi
|
| 7
|
| TOTAL
|
| 36
|
| Heat Removed in PbLi
|
|
|
| Volumetric heat in SS
|
| 100
|
| Heat transferred to He
|
| -7
|
| TOTAL
|
| 93
|
| Total Segment Power
|
| 129
|
Table IV
Coolant Flow Rates
| Inlet He density
|
| 6.16 kg/m3
|
| Inlet He volume flow rate
|
| 8.3 m3/s
|
| Outlet He density
|
| 4.97 kg/m3
|
| Outlet He volume flow rate
|
| 10.3 m3/s
|
| PbLi volume flow rate
|
| 0.25 m3/s
|
The
mass flow rate of PbLi required to remove 100 MW of power is 2400 kg/s. Using
a mass density of 9500 kg/m3, the corresponding volume flow rate is
0.25 m3/s. This leads to a PbLi velocity of 1.5 m/s in the four
parallel channels in the front row.
C. Coolant Access Tubes
A characteristic feature of Pb83Li17 is its low tritium
solubility. The resulting high tritium partial pressure can lead to
intolerably high tritium permeation losses from the coolant access tubes and
therefore generally requires additional permeation barriers. Another issue is
the material for the outlet tubes for a PbLi temperature of 700°C. There
is no steel available allowing a temperature above 600°C. To solve both
problems, it is suggested to use concentric access tubes with the liquid metal
flowing in the inner tube and helium in the annular gap. In this way helium
with a temperature of 500°C cools the liquid metal duct, especially if a
thermal insulator is arranged inside the liquid metal tube. 15-mm thick SiC is
proposed for this purpose. This design allows the use of steel for all access
tubes. Tritium from the Pb-17Li in this case will not enter the building
atmosphere but rather the helium coolant, where it can be recovered easily.
IV. POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM
The heat is removed from the blanket by two systems:
- A helium loop with an inlet temperature of 350°C and an outlet
temperature of 500°C
- A liquid metal loop with an inlet temperature of 480°C and an outlet
temperature of 700°C
This heat source can be used either for a Rankine cycle (steam turbine) or for
a Brayton cycle (closed-cycle gas turbine). A gross thermal efficiency of at
least 45% can be achieved with both power conversion systems based on the
temperatures listed above. A closed cycle helium gas turbine process is chosen
as a reference concept for the following reasons:
- A steam turbine cycle has nearly no potential for further improvement of the
efficiency. To achieve a value of 46%, already an advanced system with a steam
pressure of 31 MPa and two reheats to 565°C is required. A helium gas
turbine cycle with a maximum pressure of 18 MPa can lead to the same efficiency
at a maximum helium temperature of 650°C. A rise of this temperature
looks feasible and would increase the efficiency substantially.
- Liquid metal/water heat exchangers are always a safety concern. Those
concerns are mitigated by the use of the less reactive alloy Pb-17Li but the
acceptance of liquid metal cooling can be greatly enhanced if the potential for
a liquid metal/water reaction is avoided.
- Tritium permeation losses from the Pb-17Li through the heat exchanger tube
wall can be much more easily recovered from helium than from water.
- There is much higher flexibility for the selection of structural materials
for the components outside the irradiation environment if inert helium is
used.
- Liquid metal with a temperature of 700°C requires the use of refractory
metals in the heat exchanger. Those metals are always endangered by water
leaks becoming a source of oxygen in the system. In a system without water in
the high temperature components the helium can be purified to a much higher
degree.
A total compression ratio of ~3 is required to allow for the relatively low
helium temperature of 350° C. The temperature differences available in
both systems will result in reasonable small heat transfer surface areas in
both types of heat exchangers. For the case here having two different heat
sources (He and Pb-17Li loops), a two stage lHX is required.
V. TRITIUM REMOVAL AND CONTROL
The tritium production in one segment with a total generated power of 140 MW is
estimated to be 20 g/day. The liquid metal flow rate in one segment is 2400
kg/s. This means that the tritium concentration in the liquid metal is
increased by about 0.1 wppb during one pass through the blanket. In a
water-cooled blanket, the situation is completely different. There the liquid
metal inventory is usually circulated 10 times per day. This means the tritium
concentration increases by 20 wppb during one pass. This is a factor of 200
times higher than in the case of self-cooling where a bypass flow of about 0.5%
would be sufficient if the same tritium concentration is tolerable. A higher
bypass ratio would lead to a lower partial tritium pressure compared to a
water-cooled Pb-17Li blanket.
Furthermore, the high PbLi temperature of 700°C greatly enhances tritium
extraction because at this temperature tritium is much more mobile than at
450°C typical for water-cooled blankets. At this time, no attempt has
been made to select a suitable extraction method. This must be done together
with the selection of design and materials used for the heat exchanger.
VI. POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AND ISSUES
All of the numbers in this paper are rough estimates based on extrapolated
values from similar concepts and partly on educated guesses. Thermal-hydraulic
and thermal-mechanical analyses are particularly required to verify the
dimensions chosen. Independent of the outcome of such analyses, the following
more general issues should be addressed:
- Compatibility of SiC with Pb-17Li. The maximum interface temperature
between the two materials is below 700°C. Tests at ISPRA have shown that
the two materials are compatible at 800°C under stagnant conditions.
Tests in flowing Pb-17Li are underway there.
- Thermal Conductivity of SiC. A thermal conductivity of at least 15
W/m-K is usually required to avoid excessively large temperature differences
across the first wall. Contrary to this requirement, the maximum measured
conductivity for the SiC/SiC composite at the relevant temperature is around 10
W/m-K, decreasing rapidly under neutron irradiation. For the design proposed
here, the first wall heat flux does not pass through SiC, and a thermal
conductivity as low as possible is required because the material serves here as
an insulator. A value of 4 W/m-K has been used for the estimates. It should
be possible to achieve such a low value with either high porosity or with the
simplest 2-D composite.
- Electrical Resistance of SiC. Measured resisivities for the SiC/SiC
composite material are not available. MHD analysis of the French TAURO concept
used a value of 0.2 [Omega]-cm which had been measured for solid SiC at
1000°C [2]. Their finding was that the MHD pressure drop in a duct with
such a resisivity is tolerable. For comparison, the resisivity of ferritic
steel at 500°C is 95×10-6 ohm-cm and for Pb-17Li
130×10-6 [Omega]-cm. Pure alumina would have a resisivity of
106 [Omega]-cm at 1000°C.
- Strength and Fracture Toughness of SiC. Blanket designs based on the
use of SiC/SiC as a pressure container have been criticized frequently because
it has nearly zero ductility and is uncertain as a leak-tight container. Both
aspects, the integrity under mechanical load and the leak tightness are much
less important for the design proposed here because the SiC serves as an
insulator only. Any mechanical loads by the coolant pressure are avoided by a
pressure equalization between the flowing liquid metal and the stagnant zone at
the outer side. Therefore, it may be possible to use solid SiC or at least the
most simple 2-D composite to reduce cost decisively.
- Activation of Pb-17Li by Neutron Irradiation. One main argument
against the use of Pb-17Li blankets has been the radiotoxity of
210Po. Investigations performed in Europe during the past five
years, however, showed that this problem had been vastly overestimated. More
precise neutronic data as well as more adequate calculation methods indicate
210Po generation is orders of magnitudes lower than previously
estimated. Release experiments of 210Po from Pb-17Li proved that
the release rates are not determined by the vapor pressure of Po but rather by
the vapor pressure of a Po-Pb compound which is orders of magnitudes lower than
that of the element itself. Both effects - the lower Po-210 generation and the
lower release rates - led to the conclusion that 210Po is no longer
a significant safety issue. For a typical case, the contribution of
210Po to the total dose to the public during a LOCA has been
estimated to be less than 1%. The total release of radiotoxic materials was in
any case so small that no evacuation of the public would be required.
- Compatibility of Pb-17Li with Ferritic Steel. All the steel
structure in the blanket segment and the steel wall of the liquid metal coolant
tubes are thermally insulated from the flowing Pb-17Li by a SiC liner. There
is a gap of stagnant Pb-17Li between the steel wall and the flowing Pb-17Li for
pressure equalization. At this Pb-17Li/steel interface the temperature will be
slightly higher than the local helium temperature. The helium cooling will be
designed in a way that this coolant is heated up to the exit temperature in
regions with the lowest power density to keep this over-temperature as low as
possible. The highest steel temperature will occur, in any case, at the plasma
facing surface.
For self-cooled Pb-17Li blankets with a flow velocity of up to 2 m/s and
ferritic steel as structural material, a maximum allowable interface
temperature of 470°C has been chosen, based on a corrosion rate of less
than 20 µm/year. It is assumed that a limit about 50°C higher
can be allowed in the stagnant gap. If the corrosion at this temperature turns
out to be too high or if thermal analyses show a higher interface temperature,
the helium exit temperature can be lowered from 500°C to 460-480°C
without causing large disadvantages.
- Tritium Breeding Ratio. Self-cooled PbLi breeder blankets generally
lead to the highest breeding ratios for a given reactor geometry. For a Dual
Coolant Blanket with about the same geometry as proposed here, a TBR of 1.16
has been calculated with a 3-D Monte Carlo calculation including all openings
and gaps. In the present concept, however, about 15% of the breeder is
replaced by SiC. Scoping calculations [4] indicated that this change in
composition can reduce the TBR by about 10 points. Therefore, more detailed
neutronics analysis will be required after the overall geometry of the
LAR-tokamak has been determined.
VII. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
The blanket design proposed here can be used in tokamaks with water-cooled
components because the Pb-17Li breeder material reacts only very mildly with
water in case of leaks. The use of ferritic steel structural material with SiC
inserts allows an average neutron wall load up to 4 MW/m2, and can
lead to a gross thermal efficiency in the power conversion system of about 45%.
With a liquid metal exit temperature of 700°C, either a Rankine cycle with
a steam turbine or a Brayton cycle with a helium gas turbine can be used.
The helium-cooled first wall allows a surface heat flux up to 0.8
MW/m2 without exceeding a temperature limit of 550°C. High
thermal conductivity is not required for the SiC, which serves as a thermal and
electrical insulator only, without any mechanical load carrying functions.
SiC, with an electrical resistance between that of steel and alumina, is not a
real insulator but leads to a tolerable MHD pressure drop without requiring
insulating coatings.
No serious feasibility issues have been identified, but a number of
uncertainties remain. Potential problems are the impact of SiC on tritium
breeding, the compatibility of SiC with flowing Pb-17Li and the corrosion of
ferritic steel in stagnant Pb-17Li which may require a reduction of the helium
exit temperature. Other issues include the selection of a suitable tritium
extraction system and selection of suitable materials for the heat
exchanger.
REFERENCES
[1] F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team, "Overview of the ARIES-RS Reversed-Shear
Tokamak Power Plant Study," to be published in Fusion Eng. and
Design.
[2] L. Giancarli, et al., "Design Requirements for SiC/SiC Composites
Structural Material in Fusion Power Reactor Blankets," ISFNT4 (to be published
in Fusion Eng. and Design).
[3] S. Malang, M.S. Tillack (ed.), Development of Self-Cooled Liquid metal
Breeder Blankets", FZK-report, FZKA 5581, Nov.1995
[4] L. A. El-Guebaly, private communication.