The management assessment was carried out by an American firm, Madia & Associates, LLC, headed by William Madia a former director (2000-2003) of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He was aided by two other Americans, Charles Shank (Professor Emeritus at UC Berkeley) and T. J. Glauthier (a former Deputy Secretary of the US Department of Energy).
The Madia group recommended that a "Project Culture" needed to be created within ITER so that "a sense of excitement" would be felt "at every meeting and interaction". To create such a culture they suggested the Council needed to "identify and attract new project leadership with experience in managing large projects, a passion for success, and sensitivity to the international nature of ITER." They suggested that "project management consultants from industry" be engaged "to evaluate the project and establish metrics that measure the state of the project culture". They also recommended reducing the number of senior managers in the ITER Organization.
Among the group's other 11 recommendations, they suggested strengthening Systems Engineering, instilling a Nuclear Safety Culture, developing a Realistic ITER Project Schedule, and simplifying the ITER Organization Bureaucracy. The Executive Summary of the ITER management assessment was recently published on the New Yorker magazine website. A link to it and other recent articles on ITER are posted at http://fire.pppl.gov
A PDF of the management assessment report is also available on request from Fusion Power Associates fusionpwrassoc@aol.com